🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.