🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that may create as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the order stated in detailing its action.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the maps established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Opposition

With a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision occurs during a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have pushed back with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders criticized the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A top Democratic leader stated the court had yet again shredded its standing by approving a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.